|
Flying
in the Red
El Al, Israel’s state-owned airline,
expects to lose about $110 million in 2001. It
lost roughly that amount in 2000. Some of the red
ink is attributable to higher fuel prices, but the
lion’s share is due to the sharp drop in tourist
travel—a casualty of the failed peace process.
On April 24, 2001, El Al’s board of directors approved
a plan to cut operations 20% this year to stem the red
ink. In the absence of cost-cutting measures, red
ink would flow well above $110 million. The plan
calls for the elimination of 10 of El Al’s 50 routes
to Vienna, Manchester, Copenhagen, Chicago, Miami,
Toronto, and several Asian and African routes.
Vienna, in particular, is not surprising. After
the duly elected Freedom Party, led by Joerg Haider,
joined the new Austrian government coalition, Israel
recalled its ambassador from Vienna. Austrian
travel to Israel fell as a consequence. Political
grandstanding does not come free of charge.
El Al will sell its fleet of Boeing 747-200s and Boeing
757s. The former are fuel-guzzling, 30-year old
aircraft that require heavy maintenance. These
planes and unprofitable routes should have been shed
several years ago, but El Al kept them going with the
help of generous government subsidies. But, as we
have pointed out in numerous NBNs, there is a limit to
the amount of subsidies the Israeli government can
afford for its increasingly-bleeding, red-ink,
state-owned enterprises.
General Manager David Hermesh says that El Al’s
financial crisis will last into early 2003, and thus
desperate measures were required. In addition to
selling airplanes, El Al will lay off up to 300
employees (which will require expensive severance
packages, to be paid for by taxpayers since the airline
is losing money). In his words, “the process
will be coordinated with the workers committee and the
Histadrut.” This is Israeli speak for strikes,
sanctions, threats, bluster, and intimidation until the
government capitulates to the workers’ demands.
Finally, the kicker in the news release, Mr. Hermesh
wants and expects the government to supply an additional
$50 million, above and beyond making up for the $110
million in annual operating loss, to cover special
security and other unique costs. |