The News Behind The News
January 9, 2001


Yediot and the FPZ

Yediot Aharonot published a long commentary on Jan. 8 about Free Processing Zones, which was really a classified ad for the paper: If you are functionally illiterate and have no interest in current events as they actually are, there may be a job for you at Yediot. 

Underneath a news article reporting that Ariel Sharon has pledged to revive the FPZ project for Likit in the Negev – which article reported correctly that one of the reasons the Finance Ministry gave for opposing the FPZ was that its financial institutions would be used as a money laundering site; and though the reporter did not bother pointing out the absurdity of the government of a country that until a few weeks ago was on the United States’ list of country’s whose regular banks (which in Israel are state owned, by the way) allow money laundering, worrying about an FPZ that would be under Bank of Israel supervision getting into the laundry business, but at least the report of this absurd opposition was correct – underneath this report was a commentary by Gidon Eshet. 

Eshet charged among other things that Israel already has a free trade zone in Eilat and does not need more such “nonsense” further north; that this new FPZ wants state subsidies; that it was supposed to be exempt from laws protecting the environment; and that it wanted land to build the zone on, practically free. 

All of which Eshet would know is false, had he bothered to read the FPZ law as passed by the Knesset or the FPZ concession or had he talked to any of the potential investors. The concessionaire was going to pay for the land; absolutely no state money would be accepted in the form of subsidies or otherwise; the environment protection laws in the Zone were to be stricter than those in effect in Israel proper; and there is absolutely no similarity between a free trade zone as operating in Eilat or elsewhere and a free processing zone as planned for the Negev. 

One can understand Eshet’s desire to publish his imaginary findings, and Yediot’s desire to publish them, if we recall that the Economics editor of the paper was quoted a couple of years back saying he and his fellow journalists would “chase” or “persecute” the FPZ proposal more ferociously than they had ever done to anything previously. 

So, if you are unable to read the existing literature or do not have the reading comprehension skills of an eighth grader, if you have no interest in investigating what the real facts are, but you seek a career as a journalist, perhaps this is the time to call Yediot.


The News Behind the News Archive